Investopoly
Investopoly is a twice-weekly podcast designed to help you make better financial decisions and build wealth with clarity and confidence. Hosted by Stuart (tax adviser, financial adviser, and mortgage broker) and Campbell (senior financial adviser), each episode delivers concise, practical insights grounded in real-world strategy, research, methodologies, and case studies. You will get two episodes each week: a main episode that deep-dives into a single wealth-building topic, and a Q&A episode that answers listener questions and real scenarios. Send your questions to questions@investopoly.com.auWe also writes a weekly blog, and many podcast topics build on those ideas a...
Ep 423: Negative gearing deferred - heres how to manage the cash flow gap
Read Full Blog Here
Quarantining negative gearing doesn't just reduce a tax benefit; it can blow a hole in an investor's cash flow. Take a property with a $30,000 annual shortfall: previously, offsetting that loss might have clawed back $12,000–$14,000 in tax, bringing the real cost to around $16,000–$18,000. Now that loss must be carried forward, potentially for 10 to 20 years, leaving the investor to fund the full $30,000 upfront. For many, that makes established property simply unaffordable.
In this episode, Stuart explores a financing structure to bridge that gap, borrowing the negative gearing benefit you no longer receive upfront, and...
Q&A - Super recontributions, property versus ETFs, and the grandfathering question
Four listeners bring sharp, forward-looking questions. "Tony" wonders whether super recontribution strategies, used to cut the taxable component and reduce death benefit tax, could be the next target for a budgetary hatchet, and asks for Stuart's view without giving the government any ideas.
An anonymous listener, 37, mortgage-free on a rural Victorian property with $300k in cash, feels he's at a genuine crossroads: use a buyer's agent to acquire an inner-Melbourne house and hold, or aggressively invest into ETFs and super toward a $120k perpetual income? Stuart weighs the two paths. Tom, 36, with seven properties and a fast-growing...
Ep 422: Blame the 20-year growth cycle, not necessarily the Victorian government
Read Full Blog Here
Melbourne has tested investors' patience like nowhere else. Its median house price has grown just 1.8% a year since early 2017, below inflation, meaning that, in real terms, property is cheaper today than it was almost a decade ago. Naturally, investors want someone to blame. But in this episode, Stuart argues the usual suspects are largely wrong.
Victoria's land tax regime, tenancy reforms and ballooning state debt get cited endlessly, and Stuart doesn't dismiss them. Still, he shows why the links to prices are weaker than they appear (in one case, buying another...
Q&A- Structures, debt recycling, and accessing super
Six listeners grapple with how the new tax landscape reshapes their thinking. Nick, six years into regular ETF investing, asks whether to keep his current setup or start fresh for cleaner record-keeping, and whether a trust is now worth considering mid-journey. Matthew and Michael both probe the fine print: does the "property in a company" strategy become more attractive under a 30% minimum CGT rate, and does debt recycling for an IP deposit still preserve deductible interest?
Michelle explores buying a one-bedroom apartment as tenants in common with her 25-year-old daughter, using gifted shares as a deposit, plus...
Ep 421: Liquidity: what it really buys you
Read Full Blog Here
It's been fascinating to watch how differently asset classes have performed lately, share markets delivering strong double-digit returns while unlisted commercial property trusts and residential property in Melbourne and Sydney have struggled.
But this episode isn't about which asset class wins. It's about something quietly more important: liquidity, and the optionality it buys you.
Liquidity is how quickly and cheaply you can turn an asset into cash without disruption, and crucially, it's not about whether you expect to need cash, but whether you can access it if your circumstances...
Q&A: Company land tax, debt recycling, and building versus selling
Six listeners bring some genuinely meaty questions. Sandy digs into the technical weeds of owning property through a company—whether a discretionary trust as sole shareholder forfeits the NSW land tax threshold, and how the 25% versus 30% company tax rate applies when a capital gain lands. Prashant asks for a candid critique of his simple, four-ETF debt recycling portfolio and its cash-flow reality.
Mark poses a clever SMSF puzzle: is deliberately exceeding the concessional cap effectively an interest-free loan from the ATO—and what's he missing? Shiva wants Stuart's read on whether the CGT changes will choke listings, push...
Eight Rules Revisited #8- The four risks that can derail a plan
Eight Rules Revisited is a companion series to Stuart Wemyss's updated book, Wealth by Design, working through each of the original eight golden rules from his 2018 book, Investopoly, one episode at a time. In each episode, Stuart tests his 2018 thinking against eight more years of evidence and client experience, and is upfront about what has changed, what has simply sharpened, and what has held firm all along.Â
In this final episode of the series, Stuart takes on risk management, the rule underneath all the others, because a strategy that ignores the other seven rules can still survive a...
Ep 420: Can anything make property investing attractive again after the tax changes
Read Full Blog Here
With the negative gearing and CGT changes now law, the property industry is racing to devise workarounds to keep investor interest alive. As a genuinely independent, asset-class-agnostic firm with no bias toward property, Stuart puts six of the most likely strategies under the microscope, because to a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
The starting point: under the new rules, the after-tax internal rate of return on established property falls from around 11% to 8.4%. Can any lever claw that back? Stuart works through chasing a higher rental yield (and...
Q&A: Deploying $800k, structuring for the future, and what to spend on a car
Four listeners at pivotal moments. "John," 55 and five years cancer-free, has $800k from selling an investment property and a detailed plan for a downsizer contribution, an experiences fund, helping both daughters into homes and one big question: will his super comfortably fund $100k a year in retirement? Stuart stress-tests the numbers and the strategy.
"Chris," 44, lays out a layered plan involving an SMSF property, an investment property and a granny flat, and asks whether it's solid or whether he should be more aggressive now. "Brenton," a high-income earner still driving two ten-year-old Toyotas, poses a refreshingly human...
Eight Rules Revisited #7- Own property that everyone will always want
Rule 7 in Investopoly was direct: only invest in investment-grade property. Eight years on, the core of that still holds, but Stuart has sharpened the method and genuinely changed his mind about one part of it.
In this episode, he explains why Wealth by Design reframes the rule from "invest in investment-grade property" to something more demanding: own property with enduring, scarce and growing demand. It's a shift from a label to a test—what makes an asset something people will always want, and keep wanting, decades from now.
Stuart is candid about the one 2018 position he...
Ep 419: The best super fund for 2026? You’re asking the wrong question
You can download the full report, including the four decision flowcharts and annual review checklist, here: https://prosolution.com.au/best-super-fund-australia/
Most people choose a super fund by looking at which fund produced the highest return last year. But that is the wrong question.
The better question is: which investment strategy and super structure is most likely to deliver the best after-fee, after-tax outcome over the next 20 to 40 years, given your circumstances?
In this episode, I explain why choosing the best super fund involves two separate decisions: how your money is invested and...
Q&A - Property at 49, timing the cycle, and investing through an AI downturn
Three thoughtful listeners, each already doing a lot right and looking for the sharpest next move. A 49-year-old single police officer, no mortgage, $810k in super, a growing ETF portfolio, asks the perennial question: buy an investment property, keep doing what's working, or borrow to invest further in shares? Stuart weighs the options against her plan to retire at 57.
Slav returns with two connected questions. Having ridden the "rising tide" to 40%+ gains on regional Queensland properties and leveraged into a Melbourne outer suburb, he wants to know how you actually track a changing cycle to decide when...
Eight Rules Revisited #6- The ETF boom broke my rule, do I tightened it
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Golden Rule 6 was simple: invest in the share market using low-cost index funds. Eight years on, that argument has been comprehensively won, arguably too well. Stuart charts the scale of the shift: the ASX ETF market has ballooned from 133 funds to more than 450, and from $36 billion to over $350 billion. Indexing went from contrarian to consensus.
But that very boom created new traps. When everything gets rebranded as an "ETF," the label stops telling you much about what you're actually buying. In Wealth by Design, Stuart tightens the rule from "index...
Ep 418: Why discipline was never going to fix your cash flow
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
You can't build wealth unless you spend less than you earn and invest the difference, which makes cash flow the most fundamental discipline of all. The trouble was always effort. For years, Stuart's method was to hand-categorise three months of transactions a deliberate compromise, since analysing two or three years by hand was simply unrealistic. But three months is a snapshot, not a picture: it misses the annual rhythm of holidays, school fees and insurance renewals, and it can't reveal a trend.
In this...
Q&A - Property crossroads, gearing decisions and modelling for inflation
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Five listeners at very different life stages, each wrestling with where to direct capital next. Perth couple "Amelia and Ivan," with two investment properties and a baby on the way, weigh three distinct strategies: hold and sell later to fund a renovation, swap a townhouse for a better-taxed property, or add a third and keep them all. Stuart works through the trade-offs and what a year or two off work really means for the plan.
A 26-year-old in Sydney real estate asks how to play the long game: buy a...
Eight Rules Revisited #5: The rule i got half wrong
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
This one is different. Of all the rules in the series, Rule 5 is the first where Stuart admits he has genuinely changed his mind, not refined a nuance, but rethought the core idea.
In Investopoly, he taught the textbook approach: blend negatively correlated assets to smooth out portfolio volatility, the classic diversification playbook most investors are told to follow. Eight years and a lot of evidence later, Wealth by Design makes a different case. The real risk controls, he now argues, aren't clever correlations at all—they're quality and price. Ow...
Ep 417: Upgrade your home or invest in shares? The numbers surprised me.
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
For decades, negative gearing tipped the scales toward borrowing for an investment property over spending more on your home; investment interest was deductible, home loan interest wasn't. But with negative gearing quarantined and the effective capital gains tax rate climbing from around 20% to closer to 30–35% under the post-2027 indexation regime, that old comparison is dead. In this episode, Stuart rebuilds it from scratch.
The new contest: is a high-income household better off borrowing to upgrade the family home, or borrowing to invest in shares? He...
Q&A- Can I afford to retire, renovating vs investing, and planning solo
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Three richly detailed listener situations, three very different crossroads. First, Charles, 51, unemployed, four kids in private school, and a sprawling portfolio spanning a Singapore apartment, an SMSF, regional Queensland property, land parcels and a $500k crypto holding. His question is deceptively simple: in what order should he sell to fund a Melbourne home, and can he actually afford to retire? Stuart untangles the sequencing and confronts the concentration risk head-on.
Next, Matt and his wife in Lugarno, sitting on strong equity after a major renovation but facing single-income pressure with...
Eight Rules Revisited #4: The perpetual portfolio- growing your wealth while you spend it
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
In this episode, Stuart revisits Golden Rule 4 and admits that half of it has changed. In Investopoly, the advice was to build your asset base, then tilt toward income as retirement approached. Wealth by Design confirms the first half but overturns the second. Here's why.
Stuart makes the case that the real objective isn't income at all; it's after-tax total return and liquidity. He explains why the conventional glide path into conservative, income-heavy assets as you near retirement can quietly backfire, amplifying two risks retirees underestimate: inflation eroding your purchasing...
Ep 416: Is established residential property still worth investing in?
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
With the government's changes to established residential property now looking likely to become law, the investment case has fundamentally shifted, and those who try to ignore it will be exposed. In this episode, we unpack why quarantining negative gearing losses hits investors so hard: the asset costs materially more to hold each year, yet capital growth potential hasn't budged. We walk through the numbers, showing how an investment-grade property's after-tax internal rate of return could fall from around 11% to just 8.4% a return you might match through...
Q&A- Debt recycling, the six-year rule, and exiting your financial planner
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
In this mailbag episode, we tackle five listener questions spanning some of the trickiest decisions in personal finance. A Brisbane couple in their mid-forties, with strong super balances and a plan to knock down and rebuild, ask whether to ease off super contributions to kill debt faster or keep compounding inside the lower-tax environment and whether debt recycling is their smartest long-term play.
We unpack a thorny capital gains question on the six-year absence rule: can you settle a new home first, then sell the old one, without triggering a...
Eight Rules Revisited #3: Build a savings engine that runs on autopilot
Pre-order Wealth By Design Here
Episode three of Eight Rules Revisited continues the Thursday series comparing the eight golden rules from Investopoly with the updated versions in Wealth by Design, released 28 July.
Rule 3 — spend less than you earn and invest the difference- is one of the most straightforward principles in personal finance. It is also one of the most reliably ignored. The rule itself hasn't changed since Investopoly. What has changed is how Stuart frames the implementation, moving decisively away from tracking, measurement, and willpower toward an automated banking system that removes the need for da...
Ep 415: Tax grabs dressed up as housing policy: what investors need to know
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth By Design Here
Both Houses have passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026. Royal Assent is pending but considered a formality. For investors, property owners, business owners, and superannuation members, the changes are substantial, and the details matter enormously.
This blog provides a clear, technical breakdown of what the legislation actually does. Negative gearing losses on established residential property purchased after Budget night will be quarantined from 1 July 2027, with existing properties grandfathered under previous rules. The 50% CGT discount is replaced by cost base indexation and...
Q&A: Inheritance, relationship uncertainty, and the property timing question
Pre-order Wealth By Design Here
This episode brings together six listener questions that each involve a meaningful financial decision and, in several cases, significant personal uncertainty alongside significant financial capacity.
The first comes from a couple in their late thirties who received a substantial inheritance, now holding $3.6m in cash alongside a share portfolio and three properties. They have developed a dual-trust structure with a corporate beneficiary and are seeking a sense-check on whether the approach is sound and whether property still deserves a place in the plan.
The second involves a newly...
Eight Rules Revisited #2: Your freedom number has 3 levers
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Episode two of Eight Rules Revisited continues the Thursday series comparing the eight golden rules from Stuart's 2018 book Investopoly with the updated versions in his new book, Wealth by Design, released on 28 July.
Rule 2 states that you must know how much income you need and by when. That principle hasn't moved. What has tightened considerably is everything surrounding it. The two goals now have proper names, the freedom number and the freedom date, and the underlying framework has shifted from a single retirement cliff to three distinct phases of working...
Ep 414: The 4 decisions that determine 95% of your financial outcome
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Most people assume building wealth requires making hundreds of good financial decisions. In reality, a small number of choices do almost all of the heavy lifting, and this episode identifies exactly which ones.
The first is the choice of partner, arguably the most important financial decision a person will make. Alignment on spending, saving, and investing dramatically simplifies wealth building, while misalignment creates the stop-start behaviour that derails even well-designed strategies. Divorce, by contrast, is one of the most financially destructive events that can...
Q&A: Inheritance windfalls, home upgrades, and capital efficiency
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
This episode brings together four listener scenarios united by a common theme: significant financial capacity, but genuine uncertainty about which move to make next and in what order.
The first comes from a Sydney couple earning $540k who feel house-poor despite their income carrying a $1.9m mortgage on a home bought partly for its duplex potential, with a medium landslide risk and an $800k–$1m overseas inheritance on the way. The questions span inheritance allocation, debt recycling, cash flow management through private school fees, and how to restructure once the hu...
Eight Rules Revisited #1 - The risk nobody warns you about
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
This episode is the first in Eight Rules Revisited, a Thursday series running alongside the regular podcast. Each week, I take one of the eight golden rules from my 2018 book Investopoly and compare it with the version in my new book, Wealth by Design, out on 28 July. Some rules have changed, some have tightened, and some have simply been confirmed by eight more years of evidence and client experience. I'll tell you which is which, plainly, each week.Â
We start with Rule 1: think in decades, not days. The rule itself h...
Ep 413 : What financial advisers really do with their own money
Read Full Blog Here
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Financial advisers often manage their own money quite differently from the clients they advise. After more than two decades of observing both groups up close, those differences have become a reliable indicator of what genuinely good financial decision-making looks like in practice.
In this episode, Stuart shares nine observations drawn from that experience. Most financial advisers hold their superannuation entirely in growth assets, understanding that short-term volatility inside super is largely irrelevant when the money cannot be accessed for decades. They welcome falling markets...
Q&A - Housing wealth in retirement, super timing, and the 20-year plan
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
This episode brings together four listener questions united by a common challenge: knowing which lever to pull next when the financial position is solid but the path forward feels unclear.
The first comes from a retiree who connected with a recent episode on underspending in retirement, but raises a dimension that wasn't covered how to factor substantial debt-free property wealth, including a principal residence and a beach house, into retirement income planning. The question is whether to sell, rent, or consider a reverse mortgage to unlock equity before those assets...
Ep 412: Beware: Commercial property values look stretched
Read Full Blog Here
Pre- Order Wealth By Design Here
Commercial property is being actively promoted as a compelling alternative to residential investment, particularly as higher interest rates reduce borrowing capacity and tighter tenancy laws make residential property less attractive. On the surface, the pitch is appealing: higher rental yields, tenants paying most outgoings, and the potential for capital growth. But in Stuart's assessment, current valuations make the risk hard to justify.
This episode examines commercial property through a valuation lens, explaining how cap rates work, why current pricing looks stretched relative to...
Q&A - Listener scenarios unpacked: Perth timing, seven properties and no shares, and a retirement direction check
Pre-Order Wealth by Design Here
This episode brings together three listener scenarios that each involve genuinely complex financial positions, multiple moving parts, significant income, and decisions where getting the sequencing right matters enormously.
The first comes from a 34-year-old specialist trainee doctor in Sydney, engaged, planning a family, and facing a highly unusual income trajectory, moving from $250k now to as low as $130k during a London fellowship, before returning to Perth as a consultant earning potentially $600k or more. The central question is whether to buy a stepping-stone property in Perth's middle-ring suburbs before...
Ep 411: Should you invest all your super into an internally geared ETF
Pre-order Wealth by Design Here
Read Full Blog Here
Superannuation's enforced long investment horizon is one of the most underused structural advantages available to Australian investors. This blog examines whether internally geared ETFs have a role to play within super, and backs the analysis with detailed financial modelling rather than theory alone.
The numbers are compelling. A 30-year-old with $200,000 in super, contributing $20,000 per year and investing in a geared diversified ETF via an SMSF, is projected to retire with a balance of approximately $4.3 million, more than 26% higher than an equivalent ungeared strategy in...
Q&A - Property vs Shares: retirement sequencing, and the cash-waiting strategy
Pre-Order Wealth by Design Here
This episode brings together four listener questions that each wrestle with a different dimension of long-term wealth building, from the early decisions that set the trajectory to the late-stage sequencing that determines how comfortably retirement unfolds.
The first comes from a 28-year-old physiotherapist two years into his career, carrying $1.1 million in mortgage debt and a $98k HECS liability, asking whether surplus savings should flow into ETFs or the offset account, and whether his wife's extra super contributions are optimally placed.
The second involves a couple aged 63 and 53 with...
Ep 410: What Charlie Munger's investing checklist means for Australian investors
Pre-Order Wealth by Design Here
Read Full Blog Here
Charlie Munger left investors with ten principles that are deceptively simple and take a lifetime to apply well. This blog translates each one into practical, grounded guidance for Australian investors, moving beyond abstract philosophy to the specific decisions, mistakes, and behaviours that shape long-term outcomes in local property and share markets.
The ten principles cover starting every evaluation with downside risk before upside potential; building genuine independence from the conflicted advice that is common in Australian investment markets; preparation as the only real edge...
Q&A - Starting out, scaling up, and knowing when to sell
Pre-Order Wealth by Design Here
This episode brings together five listener scenarios that span the full arc of wealth building, from a 24-year-old taking his first steps to couples approaching retirement with complex, multi-property portfolios and competing priorities.
The first question comes from a 24-year-old earning $80k with $75k across shares and savings, limited borrowing capacity, and a genuine desire to start building wealth deliberately. The question is simple but important: shares or property first?
The second involves a Perth couple in their late forties, accidental investors who now hold four investment properties...
Ep 409: Super contribution strategies to consider before 30 June 2026
Read Full Blog Here
With 30 June approaching, now is the time to review your superannuation contribution options before the annual window closes. Most of the levers available inside super operate within a tight 12-month period, and several are use-it-or-lose-it; miss the deadline, and the opportunity is gone.
This blog walks through 10 strategies worth considering before the end of the financial year. Concessional contributions remain the most tax-effective way to grow super for most Australians, with the tax saving sharpening significantly at higher income levels. Catch-up contributions deserve particular attention this year: 2025/26 is the final opportunity...
Q&A - Income goals, property trade-offs, and the Division 296 unpacked
This episode brings together five listener scenarios united by a common thread: making sound financial decisions under competing pressures: income goals, asset quality, tax reform, and the desire for more time and freedom.
The first comes from a couple, both aged 40, with three investment properties and a growing ETF portfolio, asking what it will take to reach $200k in net annual income and reduce their working days as early as possible.
The second raises a technical but important question: under Division 296, are franking credits effectively taxed twice for those whose super balances exceed $3 million before...
Special: From 11% to 8.4% - What the 2026 Budget does to property investment returns
This special episode is a replay of a YouTube presentation which is a calm, numbers-led walkthrough of the 2026 Federal Budget - recorded roughly 40 hours after budget night - focused on the three proposals most likely to affect investors: negative gearing, capital gains tax, and family trusts. The deliberate frame throughout is that nothing is law yet, the political debate is far from settled, and listeners should resist making 20-year decisions on 40-hour-old announcements.
On negative gearing, you and Mena explain that existing properties are grandfathered, with a transitionary window to 1 July 2027 and carve-outs for new...
Ep. 408: 2026 Federal Budget: Big tax changes, but do not panic yet
Register for Thursday's live eventÂ
Read Full Blog Here
The 2026-27 Federal Budget included some of the most significant proposed tax changes we have seen in many years.
In this episode, I unpack the key announcements affecting investors, property owners, business owners, and families, including proposed changes to capital gains tax, negative gearing, and the taxation of discretionary trusts. I also cover the permanent extension of the $20,000 instant asset write-off, proposed personal tax changes, the return of company loss carry-back rules, start-up loss refundability, and the wind-back of the electric vehicle FBT exemption.