Inside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer

5 Episodes
Subscribe

By: Fred Lehrer

The Enforcement Mind with Frederick M. Lehrer is a securities law podcast built around one core advantage: perspective from inside the system. Before entering private practice, Frederick M. Lehrer served as an enforcement attorney with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and as a Special Assistant United States Attorney, investigating and prosecuting securities law violations. This show translates that experience into how the SEC actually reviews disclosures, identifies risk, and decides when scrutiny becomes action. Each episode focuses on how filings are evaluated in practice—not theory—covering S-1 registration statements, ongoing reporting obligations, comment letters, enforcement triggers, and disc...

✂️ Clip this podcast
The Future Is Being Built in Orlando: Reflections from Launchpad Liftoff
#7
Today at 12:25 PM

TO START:

For sponsorships, partnerships, speaking opportunities, media inquiries, or startup ecosystem collaboration, I’d contact:


Safia Porter
Executive Director, Building Our Tech (BOT)
📧 safia@buildingourtech.org


General Contact:
 📧 info@buildingourtech.org


Website:
 Building Our Tech (BOT)⁠

THE EVENT

A few nights ago, securities attorney and entrepreneur Fred Lehrer attended Launchpad Liftoff, a startup pitch competition hosted by Building Our Tech in Orlando.


More than 75 companies applied. Seven founders took the stage.<...


The Hidden Compliance Risk: How SEC Disclosure Language Shapes Scrutiny
#6
Last Thursday at 2:47 PM

Fred Lehrer - SecuritiesAttorney1.com

What companies say matters. How they say it matters just as much. In this episode, Fred explores why language, terminology, and narrative structure play a critical role in SEC disclosures—and how ambiguity, inconsistency, and unsupported claims can create regulatory risk even when the underlying facts are accurate.


Show Notes:


Many organizations view SEC filings as exercises in information disclosure. The focus is often on ensuring the right facts are included, the correct numbers are reported, and the required sections are completed.

...


Going Public Is Not a Moment. It Is a Permanent Disclosure System.
#4
05/13/2026

Going public is often treated as a milestone: the moment a private company enters the public markets. But from a securities law and compliance perspective, it is not a single event. It is the beginning of a permanent reporting environment. The initial registration statement, whether through an S-1, Form 10, or another pathway, does more than support a transaction. It establishes the company’s disclosure baseline.

This episode explains why the first public filing matters long after the offering or registration process is complete. Business descriptions, revenue explanations, risk factors, financial presentation, and operational disclosures become the reference po...


Why SEC Comment Letters Are Not Isolated Events
Why SEC Comment Letters Are Not Isolated Events episode artwork
#3
05/06/2026

When a company receives an SEC comment letter, the common mistake is treating it like a contained problem: answer the question, resolve the issue, move on. But a comment letter is rarely an isolated event. It is usually the visible result of a review process that began earlier, when SEC staff identified patterns, inconsistencies, gaps, or unclear disclosures in the company’s filing.

In this episode, we break down why companies should not respond to SEC comments narrowly or defensively. Each comment is a signal about how the SEC is reading and interpreting the company’s disclosures. A qu...


What Really Triggers SEC Scrutiny: Friction, Inconsistency, and Ambiguity in Disclosures
What Really Triggers SEC Scrutiny: Friction, Inconsistency, and Ambiguity in Disclosures episode artwork
#2
04/12/2026

What Really Triggers SEC Scrutiny: Friction, Inconsistency, and Ambiguity in Disclosures

The script explains that SEC scrutiny rarely starts with an obvious misstatement or major omission; it often begins with small “points of friction” such as incomplete, inconsistent, or overly generalized disclosures that prompt questions and expand iteratively. Common triggers include subtle inconsistencies across registration statements, press releases, and periodic reports; boilerplate risk factors that fail to identify company-specific risks; misalignment between narrative descriptions and actual operations or financial results; and unexplained changes in disclosures over time compared to prior filings. It also emphasizes that the SEC eval...